A bus driver saw a car that wished to exit from a junction. He stopped the bus to allow him to do so. The bus driver flashed his lights at the car driver who then came slowly across the front of the bus. The front of the car was about a yard beyond the off-side of the bus when the car was struck by a moped rider who had overtaken the bus on the off-side. The bus driver had looked in the mirror but had not seen the moped rider. It was accepted that the car driver had been only just crawling out.

Moped rider 100% to blame

On appeal, the judge stated that cyclists and motorcyclists are entitled to overtake stationary traffic but to do so warrants a very high degree of care and you must ride in such a way that you can immediately deal with an emergency. It should be noted that the dissenting judge would have found the car driver 20% blame.

Related Articles

Motorcycle Law

Grace v Tanner (2003)

Case Law Motorcycle Law
February 21, 2024

Motorcyclist collides with car at a roundabout where a car fails to take the exit dictated by the lane they were driving in.

Motorcycle Law

Jones v Lawton (2013)

Case Law Motorcycle Law
February 12, 2024

Motorcyclist filtering using opposing carriageway collides with vehicle pulling across his path at a junction. Driver 2/3rd to blame.

Motorcycle Law

Burton v Evitt (2011)

Case Law Motorcycle Law
February 12, 2024

Motorcyclist overtakes a row of stationary traffic and collides with lead vehicle which is turning right. Driver 20% to blame (on appeal).

Is it worth 5 minutes of your time?

A quick phone call allows us to ask you a few questions about what happened to you and determine whether we can help. 

This form collects your name and phone number so that we can contact you. Check out our Privacy Policy for more detail on how we store, process and protect your submitted data. If you choose not to consent, please use an alternative contact method shown on our Contact page.

Get in Touch

Name(Required)