A cyclist (Rickson) was taking part in a cycling time trial early on a Saturday morning.
He was travelling Westbound along an A-road when he collided with a van in his path (being driven by Bhakar), which had been travelling eastbound and had attempted to cross the Westbound carriageway.
Bhakar had failed to properly check for oncoming vehicles and attempted to turn at a designated gap in the dual carriageway when it was not safe for him to do so.
Rickson suffered severe spinal injuries as a result of the collision and was left paralysed.
The van driver was held primarily responsible for the collision as he had failed to exercise due care and had, indeed, created the hazard.
However, the Judge accepted that there was a reasonable opportunity for Rickson to observe the van after it had started to cross and to react appropriately by decelerating. It could not be claimed with certainty whether Rickson had been riding with his head down or not at the time of the collision.
Driver of van was held 80% responsible Cyclist 20% responsible
A link to the full decision can be found here.
Related Articles
Liddle v Bristol City Council
A cyclist was fatally injured after losing control of the rear wheel of his bicycle in a rail track and falling into the water.
Davidson v Garner 1995
A cyclist was knocked off his bike when he attempted to turn right by riding across the path of an oncoming vehicle without warning.
Sally Nicol v Andrzej Waldemar Kupinski (2017)
Cyclist riding in a group collides with fellow riders when a parked lorry starts to move out onto the road as they are trying to pass.
Is it worth 5 minutes of your time?
A quick phone call allows us to ask you a few questions about what happened to you and determine whether we can help.
This form collects your name and phone number so that we can contact you. Check out our Privacy Policy for more detail on how we store, process and protect your submitted data. If you choose not to consent, please use an alternative contact method shown on our Contact page.