Ellis v Kelly

On 20 September 2008, Caine Ellis who was 8 years old, went out to play with his two cousins at a local play park.

The play park was located on Gospel Lane in Birmingham. This was a quiet road with a play park on one side and a skateboard park and sweet shop on the other side of the road. There was a zebra crossing between the two. This was a busy area for children to be playing in.

Gospel Lane was subject to a 30mph speed limit. Caine Ellis was allowed to go out and play without adult supervision only if he was accompanied by his two older cousins who were 10 and 11 years old. He was told by his mother to be careful and stay with his cousins.

Caine Ellis had been playing in the play park. He lost his cousins and therefore went across to the skateboard park to find them. He did not find them and therefore, returned to the play park.

Sadly, as he crossed back over the road to return to the play park, he was struck by a vehicle and sustained significant injuries. He was hit as he was in the controlled area of the zebra crossing but not on the stripes. He looked straight at the car but kept on running.

He was hit by a car travelling at 40mph. The driver of the vehicle was a local man and knew the area well.

Liability was admitted but contributory negligence was alleged as the boy had run out onto the road when the vehicle was approaching and towards his mother as she had not provided clear rules for the boy to follow when out with his cousins.

It was held that the boy had looked as he crossed the road but he had just misjudged the speed of the car as it had been travelling outside his experience. Had the vehicle been travelling at 30mph or less, the driver would have had time to react and stop in time.

A reasonable driver would have slowed down approaching the zebra crossing and been alert to the possibility of children running out. No contributory negligence was found in respect of the boy.

It relation to the boy’s mother, it was held that she was responsible for taking care of his safety. She had let him taste independence by being allowed to play without adult supervision. Mrs Justice Yip stated, “to hold a mother liable would impose a too high standard on the ordinary parent making ordinary decisions in the course of parenting…It would be wholly wrong to find the mother blameworthy.”

The driver of the vehicle was found to be 100% at fault.

Related Articles

Motorcycle Law

Grace v Tanner (2003)

Case Law Motorcycle Law
February 21, 2024

Motorcyclist collides with car at a roundabout where a car fails to take the exit dictated by the lane they were driving in.


Paramasivan v Wicks (2013)

Case Law RTA Law
February 13, 2024

A 13 yr old child runs onto a road from between two parked cars and is hit by a passing motorist.


Kite v Nolan (1982)

Case Law RTA Law
February 13, 2024

A 5 year old boy runs onto the road from between a parked car and an ice cream van and is knocked over by a passing motorist.

Is it worth 5 minutes of your time?

A quick phone call allows us to ask you a few questions about what happened to you and determine whether we can help. 

This form collects your name and phone number so that we can contact you. Check out our Privacy Policy for more detail on how we store, process and protect your submitted data. If you choose not to consent, please use an alternative contact method shown on our Contact page.

Get in Touch