Mr Green was under the influence of alcohol when he collapsed in the roadway of a residential cul-de-sac. Ms Bannister reversed from her home in the cul-de-sac, looking over her right shoulder to avoid some parked cars. She continued to reverse and ran over M Green.

The Court ruled in favour of Mr Green, with Ms Bannister being held to be 40% contributory negligent.

Ms Bannister appealed the Court’s decisions claiming the judge required a driving standard of perfection.

On appeal, the Court held that Ms Bannister should have checked her nearside mirror and looked over her left shoulder, which had she had done so would have avoided running over Mr Green as she would have seen him.

When driving in a cul-de-sac, the care required specific attention to what was in the car’s path.

The appeal was dismissed and Ms Bannister was held to be 40% contributory negligent.

Related Articles

Pedestrian Law

Paramasivan v Wicks (2013)

Case Law Pedestrian Law
February 13, 2024

A 13 yr old child runs onto a road from between two parked cars and is hit by a passing motorist.

Pedestrian Law

Kite v Nolan (1982)

Case Law Pedestrian Law
February 13, 2024

A 5 year old boy runs onto the road from between a parked car and an ice cream van and is knocked over by a passing motorist.

Pedestrian Law

Jackson v Murray (2015)

Case Law Pedestrian Law
February 13, 2024

A 13 year old girl is hit by a car following alighting from a school minibus and attempting to cross the road.

Is it worth 5 minutes of your time?

A quick phone call allows us to ask you a few questions about what happened to you and determine whether we can help. 

This form collects your name and phone number so that we can contact you. Check out our Privacy Policy for more detail on how we store, process and protect your submitted data. If you choose not to consent, please use an alternative contact method shown on our Contact page.

Get in Touch

Name(Required)