Mr Green was under the influence of alcohol when he collapsed in the roadway of a residential cul-de-sac. Ms Bannister reversed from her home in the cul-de-sac, looking over her right shoulder to avoid some parked cars. She continued to reverse and ran over M Green.

The Court ruled in favour of Mr Green, with Ms Bannister being held to be 40% contributory negligent.

Ms Bannister appealed the Court’s decisions claiming the judge required a driving standard of perfection.

On appeal, the Court held that Ms Bannister should have checked her nearside mirror and looked over her left shoulder, which had she had done so would have avoided running over Mr Green as she would have seen him.

When driving in a cul-de-sac, the care required specific attention to what was in the car’s path.

The appeal was dismissed and Ms Bannister was held to be 40% contributory negligent.

Related Articles

MW v Wilkinson

MW v Wilkinson – Driver not liable in child pedestrian accident

Case Law Pedestrian RTA Law
April 27, 2026

A tragic road traffic accident involving a 5-year-old boy resulted in serious injuries, but the court found the driver was not liable. This case highlights when drivers may – and

Atkinson v Kennedy

Atkinson v Kennedy – Driver not liable in child pedestrian case

Case Law Pedestrian RTA Law
April 27, 2026

Atkinson v Kennedy demonstrates that even in serious child pedestrian accidents, liability is not automatic. The Court held the collision was unavoidable despite the driver exceeding the speed limit.

Gadsby v Hayes

Gadsby v Hayes | Child pedestrian toucan crossing case

Case Law Pedestrian RTA Law
April 27, 2026

A High Court case examining whether a driver should reduce speed to 10 mph at a toucan crossing. Despite serious injuries to a child pedestrian, the court found no negligence.

Is it worth 5 minutes of your time?

A quick phone call allows us to ask you a few questions about what happened to you and determine whether we can help. 

This form collects your name and phone number so that we can contact you. Check out our Privacy Policy for more detail on how we store, process and protect your submitted data. If you choose not to consent, please use an alternative contact method shown on our Contact page.

Get in Touch

Name(Required)