Mr Pocock was walking through the town centre of Inverness when he tripped on an uneven paving slab, injuring his left knee.
As a result of the injury, his work and daily life were severely impacted and he required assistance from his wife and other family members in carrying out basic activities. This in turn caused strained relations between Mr Pocock and his family.
Mr Pocock raised an action against the Highland Council submitting that the Council had exhibited negligent conduct by failing to repair the uneven paving prior to his accident.
The Council had known about the uneven paving for some 6 weeks before the accident in question and the nature of the hazard was such, Mr Pocock claimed, that action should have been taken within (at most) 21 days.
The case was unsuccessful.
Mr Pocock was unable to establish that a Roads Authority of ordinary competence exercising reasonable care would have acted any differently to Highland Council.
On the issue of contributory negligence, however, it was concluded that an individual exercising reasonable care for his own safety would not necessarily have noticed and avoided the hazard which Mr Pocock fell victim to.
Therefore had liability been established, Mr Pocock would not have been held to have been at fault to any degree.
A link to the full decision can be found here.
Related Articles
MW v Wilkinson – Driver not liable in child pedestrian accident
A tragic road traffic accident involving a 5-year-old boy resulted in serious injuries, but the court found the driver was not liable. This case highlights when drivers may – and
Atkinson v Kennedy – Driver not liable in child pedestrian case
Atkinson v Kennedy demonstrates that even in serious child pedestrian accidents, liability is not automatic. The Court held the collision was unavoidable despite the driver exceeding the speed limit.
Gadsby v Hayes | Child pedestrian toucan crossing case
A High Court case examining whether a driver should reduce speed to 10 mph at a toucan crossing. Despite serious injuries to a child pedestrian, the court found no negligence.
Is it worth 5 minutes of your time?
A quick phone call allows us to ask you a few questions about what happened to you and determine whether we can help.
This form collects your name and phone number so that we can contact you. Check out our Privacy Policy for more detail on how we store, process and protect your submitted data. If you choose not to consent, please use an alternative contact method shown on our Contact page.