Green Lane in Ilford, the site of the accident. Credit: Google Maps.

The pursuer had been crossing a busy suburban road lined either side with shops when she was struck by the defender’s car.

The pursuer was 5 months pregnant at the time, and the accident caused her to suffer a miscarriage, as well as significant orthopaedic injuries, abdominal injuries and a brain injury.

The defender had a clear view of the pursuer as he approached her but maintained he did not see her.

It was accepted that had he kept a lookout and seen the pursuer when he should have done, he would have avoided a collision simply by taking his foot off the accelerator pedal.

It was therefore concluded that the primary liability lay with the defender, however that the pursuer’s contribution was 25%.

The defender appealed this decision. He claimed that the Judge had understated the extent of the pursuer’s responsibility, and that her considered but flawed decision to cross the road, was a marker of greater negligence than simply crossing the road without looking.

The Court of Appeal dismissed this argument. It restated the important principle that the destructive potential of a car, even one driven at a moderate speed, is relevant to the concept of blameworthiness and makes it rare for a pedestrian to be found more responsible than a driver.

Although the pursuer was blameworthy to some extent, as she had demonstrated a disregard for her own safety, she had not taken a deliberate risk. Her actions had not put the motorist in danger or in an emergency situation. A link to the full decision can be found here.

Car driver – 75% responsible             Pedestrian – 25% responsible 

Related Articles

Pedestrian Law

Paramasivan v Wicks (2013)

Case Law Pedestrian Law
February 13, 2024

A 13 yr old child runs onto a road from between two parked cars and is hit by a passing motorist.

Pedestrian Law

Kite v Nolan (1982)

Case Law Pedestrian Law
February 13, 2024

A 5 year old boy runs onto the road from between a parked car and an ice cream van and is knocked over by a passing motorist.

Pedestrian Law

Jackson v Murray (2015)

Case Law Pedestrian Law
February 13, 2024

A 13 year old girl is hit by a car following alighting from a school minibus and attempting to cross the road.

Is it worth 5 minutes of your time?

A quick phone call allows us to ask you a few questions about what happened to you and determine whether we can help. 

This form collects your name and phone number so that we can contact you. Check out our Privacy Policy for more detail on how we store, process and protect your submitted data. If you choose not to consent, please use an alternative contact method shown on our Contact page.

Get in Touch