Hill drove through a junction past a red traffic light and struck Tremayne, a pedestrian who had not used the nearby light-controlled Pelican crossing but was crossing the junction diagonally.

The Judge held that the car driver Hill was entirely at fault because the pedestrian, Tremayne had no reason to anticipate that the motorist would ignore the traffic lights.

Hill was seriously careless and any possible failure by Tremayne to keep a proper look-out was not a contributory factor.

It was held that there is no legal duty on a pedestrian to cross a junction only at a light-controlled pedestrian crossing.  He (or she) is entitled to cross anywhere he (or she) wishes provided he (or she) takes reasonable care for his/her own safety.

Related Articles

Motorcycle Law

Grace v Tanner (2003)

Case Law Motorcycle Law
February 21, 2024

Motorcyclist collides with car at a roundabout where a car fails to take the exit dictated by the lane they were driving in.

RTA Law

Paramasivan v Wicks (2013)

Case Law RTA Law
February 13, 2024

A 13 yr old child runs onto a road from between two parked cars and is hit by a passing motorist.

RTA Law

Kite v Nolan (1982)

Case Law RTA Law
February 13, 2024

A 5 year old boy runs onto the road from between a parked car and an ice cream van and is knocked over by a passing motorist.

Is it worth 5 minutes of your time?

A quick phone call allows us to ask you a few questions about what happened to you and determine whether we can help. 

This form collects your name and phone number so that we can contact you. Check out our Privacy Policy for more detail on how we store, process and protect your submitted data. If you choose not to consent, please use an alternative contact method shown on our Contact page.

Get in Touch

Name(Required)