Denial of liability based on defence of automatism
Robert was involved in a head on collision whilst riding his motorcycle on Glasgow Road, Kirkintilloch in May 2019 when a car travelling in the opposite direction suddenly veered into his path. Robert sustained serious, life-altering injuries, including a de-gloving injury to his right thigh and a fracture to his left knee and right foot.
After meeting with Robert and receiving his instructions to pursue a claim for personal injury, we intimated a claim on his behalf to the insurers of the at-fault driver. The insurers were not prepared to accept liability on behalf of their driver. Their denial of liability was based on the defence of automatism.
Evidence from witnesses is key
Automatism as a defence is used by third party insurance companies in civil law cases to absolve them of liability in situations where the otherwise at-fault driver was deemed to be in an unconscious state at the time of the collision.
In Robert’s case, the insurers claimed that the driver had suffered from an episode of bradycardia, i.e. a drop in his heart rate and this had caused him to lose consciousness, lose control of his vehicle and subsequently veer into the opposing lane.
Our investigations into the collision revealed evidence from two independent witnesses. They had been travelling behind the driver in the lead up to the collision and they’d witnessed him driving erratically for short periods, followed by him driving correctly, managing bends and reducing his speed in line with the limits. This evidence suggested that the driver’s illness had been gradual and he’d had ample opportunity to bring his vehicle to a controlled stop before losing consciousness and causing the collision.
We secure Robert the compensation he deserved
Confident with our evidence, we pushed on and raised a Court action for damages against the insurers of the driver.
The insurers maintained their defence of automatism before finally agreeing to make Robert a significant award of compensation just a few weeks before the Court case was due to be heard before a Judge. Following hard work and a long, anxious wait, we achieved the desired result and secured Robert the compensation he deserved.
The time, effort and costs spent on this case leave us wondering in whose interest does the defence of automatism serve to protect, when insurance companies are paid to cover the risks of such eventualities and the injured party is left without compensation.
Defenc of automatism has no place in civil law
We categorically believe that those who have been injured through no fault of their own, like Robert, should be able to obtain compensation for their injuries to give them the best chance of recovery and to lead as comfortable a life as possible. The fundamental concept of insurance means that compensation should be awarded whether or not the driver was suffering from an illness and the defence of automatism has no place in civil law in an action for personal injury.
Our Award Winning Team
Brenda Mitchell
Senior Partner
Brenda has been a Personal Injury Lawyer for over 38 years and for the last 20 years has specialised representing injured motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians.
Jodi Gordon
Partner
Jodi is a Partner at RTA Law LLP with 14+ years’ experience in catastrophic injury claims for vulnerable road users including cyclists and motorcyclists.
Thomas Mitchell
Partner
Thomas represents clients who have been involved in road traffic incidents and he specialises in representing vulnerable road users such as pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists.
Our Recent Case Studies
Taxi cuts across motorcyclist
A taxi travelling in the same direction crossed in front of the motorcyclist's path to access a junction to their left. The two vehicles collided and our client was knocked
Motorcycle Accident Injury Claim | Justice after a serious crash
Ryan suffered a severe leg injury in a motorcycle accident caused by a distracted driver. Learn how Motorcycle Law Scotland fought off insurer pressure to win fair compensation.
Air ambulance saved James’ life
James was taken by air ambulance to the QEUH. He spent most of his 31 days there in the High Dependency Unit or Intensive Care.
Admiral Conflict of Interest
Never assume the 3rd party insurer will act in your best interests. They have a conflict of interest. Seek your own specialist legal representation.
Is it worth 5 minutes of your time?
A quick phone call allows us to ask you a few questions about what happened to you and determine whether we can help.
This form collects your name and phone number so that we can contact you. Check out our Privacy Policy for more detail on how we store, process and protect your submitted data. If you choose not to consent, please use an alternative contact method shown on our Contact page.