Rush-hour cycling turns dangerous.
Simon was cycling home from work in Edinburgh on a clear and dry September evening. It was rush-hour and, as a seasoned cyclist, he was wearing a helmet cam, just in case. Cycling in the designated cycle lane which was protected from vehicular traffic by Orca markers and raised poles, he came to a marked bus-stop. The cycle lane ended at this point and as there were no buses ahead, Simon continued his journey through the bus stop to pick up the cycle lane on the other side.
Just as he was about to enter the cycle lane again beyond the bus stop, he was overtaken by a car whose driver then turned immediately left into a junction. Simon had to take evasive action, causing him to swerve to the right where he collided with an orca. He flew over his handlebars before landing heavily on the carriageway, sustaining injuries. Meantime, oblivious to what had just happened, the car driver completed his turn into the junction.
Helmet cam evidence proves the facts.
The whole incident was captured on Simon’s helmet cam and provided to the Police. Initially, the Police were going to charge the car driver with a contravention of Section 3 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which is careless driving. However, that was cancelled on the instruction of a senior Police officer, who held the opinion that because the cycle lane stopped for the bus stop marking, then the car driver had done nothing wrong.
We intimated a civil claim for compensation to the car driver’s insurance company. We supplied a copy of the helmet cam footage to make things easy. To our surprise, the Insurer denied liability, saying, amongst other things, that our client had been travelling at 20-25 mph, had been looking out for potholes and had not seen the car turning in time. They claimed that he had the accident because he took action to avoid hitting the car and struck the bollard instead.
Our response to that was simple:
“You are missing the fundamental point: your insured failed to give way and drove into the path of our client. Your insured’s actions are in contravention of the Highway Code.”
Police decision challenged.
We also highlighted that, in our opinion, the Police decision was wrong too.
We visited the accident locus with Simon and Ewen, our Head of Legal Support who is a former police officer. We then prepared the case for Court, re-attending the locus to take more video footage so that we could explain clearly to a Judge the actions of the driver which forced the reaction from our cyclist.
Our Award Winning Team
Brenda Mitchell
Senior Partner
Brenda has been a Personal Injury Lawyer for over 38 years and for the last 20 years has specialised representing injured motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians.
Jodi Gordon
Partner
Jodi is a Partner at RTA Law LLP with 14+ years’ experience in catastrophic injury claims for vulnerable road users including cyclists and motorcyclists.
Thomas Mitchell
Partner
Thomas represents clients who have been involved in road traffic incidents and he specialises in representing vulnerable road users such as pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists.
Our Recent Case Studies

Cyclist injured at Glasgow roundabout wins claim despite insurer denying liability
A Glasgow cyclist suffered a fractured foot and had his brand-new Merida Reacto destroyed when a driver entered a roundabout and collided with him. Despite the driver's apology, her insurer

Cyclist hit by untraced driver files MIB compensation claim
A Glasgow cyclist knocked from his e-bike was unable to identify the driver responsible. Cycle Law Scotland pursued his claim through the Motor Insurers’ Bureau, securing rehabilitation and more than

Pothole case Glasgow
An experienced cyclist suffered a serious wrist fracture after striking a pothole concealed beneath floodwater on a shared-use path at Hogganfield Loch, Glasgow. Cycle Law Scotland investigated the history of

Cyclist injured by German tourist on Scottish cycle path
Colin was cycling on National Cycle Route 75 when he was involved in a head-on collision with a German tourist who instinctively rode on the wrong side of the shared-use
Is it worth 5 minutes of your time?
A quick phone call allows us to ask you a few questions about what happened to you and determine whether we can help.
This form collects your name and phone number so that we can contact you. Check out our Privacy Policy for more detail on how we store, process and protect your submitted data. If you choose not to consent, please use an alternative contact method shown on our Contact page.
