A car drove directly into Fiona from behind
In June, Fiona who is a confident, experienced cyclist and has achieved podium placings at a number of sportives, was cycling a short distance home from work on the A87 near Kyle in the North West of Scotland. She was travelling around 20mph on a straight and open road in clear visibility and dry conditions when suddenly a car drove directly into her from behind.
The A87 is a national speed limit road and it is believed that the third-party vehicle was travelling in excess of 50mph. Fiona was wearing hi-viz arms, her bright club short sleeve jersey and had a rear flashing red light. She was positioned about 1 metre into the carriageway.
Astonishingly, Fiona didn't sustain any serious fractures
On impact, Fiona landed on the windscreen and was then thrown onto the road when the car braked. As she was clipped into her pedals, her bike came with her onto the car bonnet before being flung back down onto the road landing on its handlebars. Fiona’s left foot came out of her shoe, leaving it still in the cleat on the bike.
Astonishingly, but thankfully, Fiona managed to walk away from the incident without any serious fractures. However, she did sustain extensive ligament damage to her left shoulder, she broke her big toe, had deep cuts requiring stitches and was generally battered and bruised all over. There was significant damage to both her bicycle and helmet.
Fiona contacted Cycle Law Scotland in order to pursue a claim against the driver’s motor insurer. She knew she would require extensive physiotherapy to assist her with her recovery back to full fitness and she was also looking to be compensated for the damage to her bicycle and kit.
Cycle Law Scotland raise a Court Action
A claim was intimated to the insurers and liability was admitted early on. The insurers made an early offer of £2500 plus private physiotherapy to settle matters within one month of the collision.
However, given the extent of Fiona’s injuries, this proposal was premature and was rejected.
Fiona used her bike regularly and she was keen to be able to return to cycling. Therefore, we pushed for an early interim payment and secured it within two months of the collision.
When it came to settlement negotiations, the insurers were unwilling to compensate Fiona for a replacement helmet. An image showing the extent of the damage was sent to them, but they insisted upon the original receipt. Given the extent of the collision, we were unwilling to resolve matters without Ms Grant being fully compensated for her damaged items. As a consequence of the insurer’s position, we proceeded to raise a Court Action.
A reasonable proposal was made
A protective helmet is a protective piece of equipment which must be replaced following an incident if there is any chance that it may have been compromised to any degree from the impact. The images of Fiona’s helmet clearly showed a crack.
Once the matter had been raised, it was very quickly passed over to the insurer’s solicitors to deal with matters on their behalf. A few days later, a reasonable proposal was made, to include the damaged helmet, and the case was resolved.
Whilst the wearing of a helmet is of course not compulsory, those who choose to wear a helmet should always be compensated in full if the helmet has been damaged at all in the road traffic collision. It would never be appropriate to purchase a second hand helmet on the basis that an insurance company was unwilling to compensate in full.
Our Award Winning Team
Brenda Mitchell
Senior Partner
Brenda has been a Personal Injury Lawyer for over 38 years and for the last 20 years has specialised representing injured motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians.
Jodi Gordon
Partner
Jodi is a Partner at RTA Law LLP with 14+ years’ experience in catastrophic injury claims for vulnerable road users including cyclists and motorcyclists.
Thomas Mitchell
Partner
Thomas represents clients who have been involved in road traffic incidents and he specialises in representing vulnerable road users such as pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists.
Our Recent Case Studies
Pothole case Glasgow
An experienced cyclist suffered a serious wrist fracture after striking a pothole concealed beneath floodwater on a shared-use path at Hogganfield Loch, Glasgow. Cycle Law Scotland investigated the history of
Cyclist injured by German tourist on Scottish cycle path
Colin was cycling on National Cycle Route 75 when he was involved in a head-on collision with a German tourist who instinctively rode on the wrong side of the shared-use
Cyclist injured by hidden pothole secures full compensation
A keen cyclist suffered multiple injuries after hitting a pothole concealed beneath standing water near Kilmarnock. Despite attempts to reduce compensation, Cycle Law Scotland successfully secured a full settlement.
Leith Walk tram track cycling accident
Hannah suffered injuries after her bicycle wheel became trapped in tram tracks on Leith Walk in Edinburgh. Cycle Law Scotland investigated and discovered the cycle lane measured just 0.33 metres
Is it worth 5 minutes of your time?
A quick phone call allows us to ask you a few questions about what happened to you and determine whether we can help.
This form collects your name and phone number so that we can contact you. Check out our Privacy Policy for more detail on how we store, process and protect your submitted data. If you choose not to consent, please use an alternative contact method shown on our Contact page.